EFF’s Insourcing Bill Sparks Debate Over Corruption, Worker Exploitation, and State Efficiency
Viable News Team 
A new piece of legislation currently before Parliament could fundamentally change the way government services are delivered in South Africa. The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), known for their pro-worker and anti-corruption stance, have tabled the Insourcing Bill, spearheaded by EFF Member of Parliament Omphile Maotwe. If passed, the Bill would compel all organs of the state to insource essential services such as security, cleaning, and maintenance services that are currently widely outsourced to private companies.
The proposed Bill has ignited a national conversation on corruption, state capacity, and worker rights, drawing both praise and scrutiny from different corners of society.
A Move Against Corruption and Exploitation
According to Maotwe, the central aim of the Insourcing Bill is to dismantle what the EFF views as a deeply corrupt tender system that has hollowed out the state’s ability to serve its people. Speaking in a televised interview with eNCA, Maotwe did not mince words.
“The majority of the state services are being outsourced and what has since led to that is corruption,” she stated. “The root cause of the problems we have is due to the tendering system. This leads to corruption, where people [to an extent] kill each other and fight for these tenders.”
Maotwe added that despite billions spent on contracts with private providers, most of the outsourced services have yielded little improvement in delivery or outcomes, while simultaneously fueling fraud and enabling exploitation of workers.
The Bill in Detail
The Insourcing Bill is straightforward in its thrust: all state organs would be legally mandated to insource their services. Where this is not feasible, entities must formally apply for an exemption, justifying why outsourcing is necessary. This, the EFF argues, would drastically limit the arbitrary use of tenders and force departments to prioritize direct service provision through public employment.
The EFF has long campaigned on issues of economic justice, worker dignity, and anti-corruption. Through this Bill, they seek to restore what they view as the eroded integrity and capacity of the public sector.
COSATU’s Endorsement
The Bill has gained key support from the Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU), one of the country’s largest labour federations. COSATU has publicly welcomed the legislation, describing it as a “progressive” step toward re-establishing accountability and protecting workers’ rights.
According to COSATU, outsourcing has been a “key enabler of corruption and state capture,” allowing politically connected contractors to siphon public funds through inflated or poorly executed tenders. The federation also emphasized that many outsourced workers face low wages, poor working conditions, and job insecurity, despite often performing critical public functions.
A Legacy of Tender Abuse
The issue of tenders and procurement irregularities has long plagued South Africa’s public sector. Reports from the Zondo Commission on State Capture highlighted how procurement loopholes were used to channel public funds into private pockets, frequently with no service delivery to show for it. This has eroded public trust and has had devastating impacts on municipal and national service delivery from broken water systems to unreliable public safety measures.
The EFF and other critics argue that outsourcing has effectively created a parallel state: one where private contractors run essential services without the same oversight, accountability, or worker protections. By eliminating unnecessary outsourcing, they believe the state can be rebuilt from within.
Challenges Ahead
While the Insourcing Bill has strong backing from organized labour and left-leaning political forces, it faces significant challenges. Some critics argue that complete insourcing is impractical in certain contexts, such as highly specialized services or rapidly scaling operations. There are also concerns about the financial and administrative capacity of state organs to take over service delivery functions immediately and efficiently.
In anticipation of these concerns, the Bill includes a provision for exemptions, but opponents may still push back, arguing that insourcing could bloat public payrolls and reduce flexibility in responding to urgent needs.
Private companies that currently benefit from state contracts are also likely to lobby against the Bill, citing potential job losses and disruption to existing agreements.
A Test for Political Will
As the Bill moves through Parliament, it will test the governing ANC’s commitment to the promises made during and after the Zondo Commission promises to reform procurement systems, eliminate corruption, and rebuild state capacity. It will also reveal whether political leaders are willing to confront entrenched private interests and prioritize worker welfare.
For the EFF, the Bill is more than just policy it is a cornerstone of their broader ideological project: to reclaim the state for the people, especially the working class. Whether it will succeed depends not just on votes in Parliament, but on public pressure and political momentum in the months ahead.
Written by [Viable Media]
Johannesburg, South Africa
About the Author
